Legal Opinion
Gaynor v. Hi-Tech Homes
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 8, 2014No. AC35302PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALVORD, J.
The self-represented defendant, Richard Stein,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, *269following a hearing in damages, awarding $72,022.19 to the plaintiffs, Sung Gaynor and Donald Gaynor. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) awarded damages for breach of the parties’ agreement because he had completed all of the work, and (2) awarded attorney’s fees under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq. We affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Naples v. Keystone Building & Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Muniz v. KravisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Hudson United Bank v. Cinnamon Ridge Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Porter v. MorrillConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gallinari v. KlothDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Henderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Medical Device Solutions, LLC v. AferzonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Laura Piao v. William Smith and Jennings Smith Investigations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Bethlehem v. AckerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.