Legal Opinion

Robichaud v. Hewlett Packard Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 11, 2004No. AC 23658; AC 24302PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

In these two appeals, consolidated for purposes of oral argument, the plaintiffs, Steven Robichaud and Thomas C. Nicholson, Jr., appeal from (1) the denial of their motion for class certification and (2) the granting of the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, Hewlett Packard Company.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*850The pleadings, affidavits and other documentary information presented to the court reveal the following facts. The defendant’s ink-jet printers typically include a replaceable ink cartridge in the box at the time of sale. In the spring…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Robert L. Moore and Jeannette S. Parry v. Painewebber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Schallenkamp v. DelPonteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Rivera v. Veterans Memorial Medical CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Whitaker v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Palmer v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Dark Peak Drive v. Del Webb CommunitiesNevada Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Justin Orsini v. Hoffman Ford, Inc., et alDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API