Legal Opinion

Milton E. Dam and Everett S. Dam, Co-Partners Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Dam Brothers v. General Electric Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1958No. 15395_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Chief Judge.

Milton and Everett Dam appeal from a motion for summary judgment granted in favor of General Electric Company by Judge Sam M. Driver in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington.

The Dam Brothers brought suit against General Electric alleging that General Electric had breached an oral contract made with the Dam Brothers in 1913, whereby it was agreed that these two parties would exploit the Priest Rapids area on the Columbia River in the state of Washington. The plaintiffs, Dam Brothers, were interested in the Priest Rapids area for an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  3. Teeter v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Halver v. WelleWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Kilbourne v. KilbourneWashington Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Seattle Professional Engineering Employees Ass'n v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Collord v. CooleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hartman v. StumboSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  4. Yokochi v. YoshimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Eckert v. Skagit Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API