British Airways Board v. Port Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
POLLACK, District Judge.
Several municipalities, organizations, and private individuals have moved to intervene in this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a), (b). For the reasons which appear hereafter, the motions are denied. Leave to renew the motions will be granted, however, on good cause shown.
Plaintiffs, two foreign airlines, seek declaratory and injunctive relief from the decision by the defendant Port Authority of March 11,1976, which prohibited them from operating the Concorde supersonic jet aircraft at John F. Kennedy International Airport for six months. The applicants…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union v. WDAY, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Co. v. Manning, Maxwell & Moore, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
3Cited by21 opinions
- Usery v. BrandelDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
- Kamerman v. SteinbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Manuli Autoadesivi, S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Miller v. SilbermannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- McKinstry v. Genesee County Circuit JudgesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.