Legal Opinion
Kamerman v. Steinberg
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 3, 1988No. 84 Civ. 4440 (CBM), 84 Civ. 4550 (CBM), 84 Civ. 4654 (CBM), 84 Civ. 4665 (CBM) and 84 Civ. 8001 (CBM)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
These consolidated cases, filed in 1984, arise out of an alleged scheme by defendants to “greenmail” the Walt Disney Company (Disney). Plaintiffs contend that defendants filed materially misleading Schedule 13D forms, in violation of Sections 10(b) and 13(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78m(d), and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. In connection with the cases, the parties submitted numerous motions, the following seven of which were pending on November 12, 1987.
1. Motion by Ernst & Co. and George M. Aronwald to Intervene and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kamerman v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Kamerman v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Kamerman v. SteinbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Town of East HamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- New York News Inc. v. Newspaper & Mail Deliverers' UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.