Legal Opinion
United States v. International Business Machines Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 6, 1974No. 69 Civ. 200PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDELSTEIN, Chief Judge:
Cravath, Swaine & Moore (Cravath), attorneys representing defendant, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), moves “to intervene as a matter of right, nunc pro tunc, in this proceeding,1 and, upon intervention, to vacate this Court’s Adjudication of Contempt against . . .IBM dated August 1, 1973 . . . .”2 Additionally, IBM moves for the vacation of this court’s contempt adjudication on due process and equal protection grounds.
On August 1, 1973 this court held IBM in civil contempt for its continued failure to comply with Pretrial Order No. 5, which was…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- William E. Nuesse, Commissioner of Banks, State of Wisconsin v. William Camp, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- SavinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v. Sequa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Xerox Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. MitlofDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- United States v. American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers of the National Ass'n of RealtorsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
- Spirt v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.