Legal Opinion
McKinstry v. Genesee County Circuit Judges
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 1, 1987No. 4:87-cv-40114PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEWBLATT, District Judge.
Before the Court are several motions pending in the above-captioned matter. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, filed a motion to intervene as a defendant in this action pursuant to Rule 24(a)(2) and (b)(2), Fed.R. Civ.P. Rule 24(a)(2) states that intervention shall be permitted:
when the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and he is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede his ability to protect that…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dubinka v. Judges of the Superior Court of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Dubinka v. Judges of Superior Court of State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Mead v. BatchlorMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Tesmer v. GranholmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.