Usery v. Brandel
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District Judge.
The Secretary brings this action to test the propriety under the Fair Labor Standards Act [hereinafter “FLSA” or “the Act”] of a “sharecropper” arrangement between Brandel and certain migrant agricultural workers. Consideration of the interesting questions presented by this cause must, however, abide the resolution of a motion to intervene brought by several of the so-called “sharecroppers,” and yet another skirmish in a long-running discovery battle between the present parties.
Defendant Brandel operates several farms in Oceana County, Michigan. As…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kathy Stupak-Thrall,plaintiffs-Appellees v. Daniel Glickman,defendants, the Wilderness Society, Proposed Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Jerry Brandel, Individually, and D/B/A Jerry Brandel FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Sumitomo Metals Industries, Ltd. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Athridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.