Legal Opinion

Usery v. Brandel

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided August 18, 1980No. G76-393 CA6PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District Judge.

The Secretary brings this action to test the propriety under the Fair Labor Standards Act [hereinafter “FLSA” or “the Act”] of a “sharecropper” arrangement between Brandel and certain migrant agricultural workers. Consideration of the interesting questions presented by this cause must, however, abide the resolution of a motion to intervene brought by several of the so-called “sharecroppers,” and yet another skirmish in a long-running discovery battle between the present parties.

Defendant Brandel operates several farms in Oceana County, Michigan. As…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kathy Stupak-Thrall,plaintiffs-Appellees v. Daniel Glickman,defendants, the Wilderness Society, Proposed Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Jerry Brandel, Individually, and D/B/A Jerry Brandel FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. Sumitomo Metals Industries, Ltd. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  4. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  5. Athridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API