Marx v. Hefner
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Courier County; S. H. Bussell, Judge. Action by R. A. Hefner against Moses Marx and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. This is an action, brought by defendant in error, hereinafter called “plaintiff,” against plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called “defendants,” to recover for legal services rendered in securing the enrollment of defendants as minor Mississippi Choctaw Indians.
Read the full summary
Error from District Court, Courier County; S. H. Bussell, Judge. Action by R. A. Hefner against Moses Marx and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. This is an action, brought by defendant in error, hereinafter called “plaintiff,” against plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called “defendants,” to recover for legal services rendered in securing the enrollment of defendants as minor Mississippi Choctaw Indians. The contract for said services was entered into and the services rendered prior to statehood., This action was instituted August 30, 1910, tried to a jury, resulting…
1Opinion of the Court
COLLIEE, C.
(after stating the facts as above). Motion is made by plaintiff to dismiss this cause, upon the ground:
“That defendants’ brief does not contain an abstract, setting forth the material parts of the pleadings, facts, and documents upon which the ease was tried, sufficient to authorize the court to decide this ease without reference to the case-made.”
This motion has received at our hands the most careful consideration; but, under the liberal construction as to procedure in this state, we feel that the benefit of any doubt as to the sufficiency of the presentation of the assignments of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cox v. DelmasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Greenville National Bank v. Evans-Snyder-Buel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Curtis & Gartside Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Wagner v. NagelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Mellon v. FultonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jeanne Armsted Rhody and Donnell Rhody v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Carron v. AbounadorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- CIT Corporation v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Royal Neighbors of America v. FletcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Rogers v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.