Legal Opinion

Greenville National Bank v. Evans-Snyder-Buel Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 7, 1900PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Error from the District Court of Canadian County; before John C. Tarsney, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Bukwelu, J.:

The defendant in error, the Evans-Snyder-Buel company, prior to April 22, 1897, advanced to S. E. Sherwood |20,265, for the purpose of buying cattle. With this money Sherwood purchased 1,613 head of steers, 872 of which were 3 and 4 years old, and 741 2 years old. These cattle were purchased in Texas, and moved from there to Sherwood’s pasture, in the Ohick-ásaw Nation, Indian Territory. On April 22, 1897, Sherwood executed to the Evans-Snyder-Buel company his two promissory notes, one for $10,514, due October 15, 1897, and the other for $10,892,36, due…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Edgerly v. . BushNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Porter v. DementIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Bradley v. McKeeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1837
  5. Corbett v. LittlefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Blevins v. W. A. Graham Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Shelby v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Anderson v. Oklahoma Moline Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  4. Frick Co. v. OatsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Motor Investment Co. v. BreslauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API