Rogers v. Daniel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, C.
There is only one question presented by the record in this case, and that is whether the trial court erred as a matter of law in sustaining the demurrer to the petition of plaintiffs and dismissing the action as to the defendant Richard T. Daniel.
Both plaintiffs and defendants in their briefs agree that the question presented for determination here has never before arisen in this jurisdiction. It is, therefore, a question of first impression so far as this court is concerned, and the conclusion reached herein must be drawn from a construction of the applicable statutes of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Pearson v. DarringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Jordan v. WestermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Shelton v. PendletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1847
- Hunt v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kelly v. MaupinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Sherry v. RoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Hanska v. HanskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Meyers & Batzell v. MoezieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
- Swick v. SwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993