Legal Opinion
CIT Corporation v. Edwards
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 4, 1966No. 41081PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The action was instituted by the plaintiff, the C.I.T. Corporation, to recover the balance due on a conditional sales contract to which the defendant, Paul C. Edwards, filed a counterclaim based on usury. The trial court rendered judgment for both parties on their claims and the plaintiff appeals.
The petition of the plaintiff alleged that, on June 8, 1960, the defendant entered into a conditional sales contract with the A.B.C. Building Company of Tulsa, Oklahoma by which he purchased a 1959 Aero Commander airplane, that the conditional sales contract was thereafter assigned to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mick v. American Dental Assn.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Scott v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Betz v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Givens v. Western Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Cobb v. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- R.L. Clark Drilling Contractors, Inc. v. Schramm, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Benham v. KellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Catron v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- McGalliard v. Liberty Leasing Co. of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Kentucky Bluegrass Contracting, LLC v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.