Jeanne Armsted Rhody and Donnell Rhody v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
The issue presented by this diversity action is whether, under Oklahoma conflict of laws rules, Texas or Oklahoma law should be applied to determine the benefits due appellants under an uninsured motorist policy issued by appellee. The precise question to be answered is whether Oklahoma applies the doctrine of lex loci contractus in an action arising from injuries sustained in Oklahoma by an Oklahoma resident who is insured under a policy issued in Texas. We find that, where a contract does not indicate a place of performance, the doctrine applies, and the law of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Propper v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Huddleston v. DwyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Devery Implement Co. v. J.I. Case Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Mountain Fuel Supply, a Utah Corporation, and Cna Insurance Company v. Reliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Claro Gonzales and Tomasa R. Gonzales, by Personal Representative v. Millers Casualty Insurance Company of Texas, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.