Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Davis v. Fresno Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 2015No. F068477PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J. —

Plaintiff Stephen K. Davis is a taxpayer challenging a noncompetitive bid contract between the Fresno Unified School District (Fresno Unified) and Harris Construction Co., Inc. (Contractor), for the construction of a middle school for $36.7 million. The construction was completed in 2014 pursuant to a lease-leaseback arrangement that Fresno Unified and Contractor contend is exempt from competitive bidding under Education Code section 17406. 1

Davis alleged the school construction project should have been competitively bid because the lease-leaseback arrangement did not…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Stigall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. Raybon, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. San Bernardino County v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. De Vries v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Cal. Taxpayers Action Network v. Taber Constr., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API