De Vries v. Regents of the University of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SEGAL, J.—
INTRODUCTION
Federal law makes undocumented immigrants ineligible for state and local public benefits, but allows a state to “affirmatively provide[] for such eligibility” through “the enactment of a State law.” (8 U.S.C. § 1621(d).) The California Constitution generally gives the Regents of the University of California plenary authority to establish rules and policies to govern the internal affairs of the University of California. The issue in this appeal is *579whether three California legislative “enactments” affirmatively provide “eligibility” under federal law for…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Upshaw v. Superior Court of Alameda Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Dli Props. LLC v. HillCalifornia Superior Court · 2018
- Cal. Manufacturers & Tech. etc. v. State Water Resources Control Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- City & County of SF v. All Persons Interested in Matter of Prop. GCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- City and County of S.F. v. All Persons Interested etc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.