Legal Opinion

Stigall v. City of Taft

California Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1962No. S. F. No. 20906PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of dismissal entered upon demurrers to the complaint which were sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff seeks a declaration of the invalidity of a certain contract for plumbing work to be performed by the defendant Taft Plumbing Company, Inc., for the defendant City of Taft.

Plaintiff, a taxpayer of the City of Taft, alleges in his complaint that Glenn D, Black was a member of the city *567council and was in charge of the council’s building committee of the City of Taft for several years prior to June 8, 1961; that the committee supervised the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Stockton Plumbing & Supply Co. v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Terry v. BenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Katenkamp v. Union Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Lexin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API