Legal Opinion
Buehler v. Bassett
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 1924No. Civ. No. 4332PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEWITT, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs brought this action for a partition of certain real property, to quiet title to the several undivided interests therein claimed by them, and for an accounting. They are the surviving children of Joseph M. Workman and Josephine Workman, his wife. The defendant Ida L. Kelso, now the wife of Fred Kelso, was formerly the wife of George Workman, a deceased son of Joseph M. Workman, who died in 1904. The defendant Charles N. Bassett is the son and sole heir at law of O. T. Bassett, deceased. As originally instituted, the action involved a tract of land in Los Angeles…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Gray v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gavina v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Alexander v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Producers Fruit Co. v. GoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Klebora v. KleboraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Brownell v. GebhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.