Legal Opinion
Alexander v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 28, 1942No. 2463-2466PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, Circuit Judge
On June 15, 1926, Armais Arutunoff was the owner of certain United States patents and applications for patent covering electrically-driven submergible pumps. On that date he entered into a written contract with Phillips Petroleum Company. It provided that Phillips should advance not to exceed $25,000 to Arutunoff for the purpose of testing and developing the devices covered by the patents; that Arutunoff should construct and install in oil wells of Phillips two complete pumping units, in accordance with the patents and applications; that the devices should be operated and completely tested;…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Conway's Executors & Devisees v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Oldland v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Potash Co. of America v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Chisholm v. HouseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Hicks v. WeaverDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.