Legal Opinion

Klebora v. Klebora

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1931No. Docket No. 7966PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODELL, J., pro tem.

The appellant sued to quiet title to an undivided half interest in a piece of improved real estate in San Francisco. The respondent Charles J. Klebora answered asserting his ownership of an undivided three-quarters of the whole, and the respondent Martha Baugh answered claiming an undivided quarter of the whole. Judgment went for said respondents decreeing their interest to be vested in the proportions they claimed, and consequently that the appellant had no interest. From that judgment this appeal is taken.

The present litigation is the outgrowth of a contested divorce…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. In Re Estate of DargieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Roberts v. WehmeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Estate of HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Harrold v. HarroldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API