Legal Opinion
In the Disciplinary Matter Involving Triem
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1996No. S-6702, S-6732PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*636OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Frederick W. Triem, an attorney licensed to practice law in Alaska, appeals a decision by the Board of Governors of the Alaska Bar Association, sitting as a Disciplinary Board (Board), which found that Triem had committed ethical violations in his representation of Robert Zorich and in his professional dealings with attorney Dennis McCarty. Bar Counsel cross-appeals the Board’s dismissal of a grievance against Triem filed by David Lubin, the Board’s failure to impose sanctions against Triem for his dishonesty before the Area Hearing Committee, and the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Christine Meyer United States of America v. Theresa Fitzgibbon United States of America v. Virginia SendersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Mississippi State Bar v. YoungMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Whitesides v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- In the Disciplinary Matter of FriedmanAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- State, Department of Commerce & Economic Development, Division of Insurance v. SchnellAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re the Reinstatement of WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Disciplinary Matter Involving SheaAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.