Legal Opinion

In the Disciplinary Matter of Friedman

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2001No. S-8542PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I, INTRODUCTION

Attorney Elliott Friedman, acting for all plaintiffs in a complex tort suit, deposited an $81,000 settlement contribution in his client trust account. Without permission from the other plaintiffs' attorneys, he drew on the trust account to advance funds to his client and to pay himself attorney's fees not yet due him. He also drew on the trust account to pay himself fees in the matters of five other claimants before he had deposited the settlement funds in those matters. These payments breached fiduciary duties he owed the other plaintiffs in the tort…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re a Member of State Bar of Arizona RileyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving WestAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving TriemAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Matter Involving MannAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Martin N. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Wasserman v. BartholomewAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Tessa M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hallam v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BrionAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API