United States v. Christine Meyer United States of America v. Theresa Fitzgibbon United States of America v. Virginia Senders
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MIKVA, Circuit Judge:
In this case, we review a district court’s decision to dismiss several informations on the ground of prosecutorial vindictiveness. The government contends that the district court’s finding of vindictiveness is wrong as a matter of law and perilous as a matter of policy. The government further contends that even if vindictive prosecution occurred, the remedy that the district court imposed is unwarranted. We decline to accept these claims. According proper deference to the lower court, we affirm its order to dismiss.
I. Background
On April 22, 1985, officers of the United…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Hollywood Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Gary Anthony PatrickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- United States v. David D. SchoolcraftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Alberto ParamoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- State v. KorumWashington Supreme Court · 2006
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.