Legal Opinion

In Re the Reinstatement of Wiederholt

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2001No. S-9171PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Disbarred attorney Jon E. Wiederholt seeks review of the Alaska Bar Association Disciplinary Board's denial of his petition for reinstatement to the practice of law. Because the board took all of the relevant factors into account and because the weight of the evidence supports the board's findings, we affirm the decision not to reinstate Wied-erholt.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On July 8, 1994 this court disbarred Jon E. Wiederholt from the practice of law for (1) filing a pleading and affidavit stating that his client's judgment had not been satisfied…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Ex Parte MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Petition of PierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re the Reinstatement of WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Milligan v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State BarWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In Re a Disbarred Member of the State Bar of Arizona, ArrottaArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  5. South Anchorage Concerned Coalition, Inc. v. Municipality of Anchorage Board of AdjustmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API