Whitesides v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*1132OPINION
MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.
The question presented is whether licensed drivers are entitled to in-person hearings before a hearing officer concerning the revocation of their licenses, or whether telephone hearings satisfy due process. We hold that where drivers' credibility is material in-person hearings are required. 'The right to drive is important, in-person communications are more effective in transmitting a sense of whether a party is telling the truth, and added costs do not outweigh the value of in-person hearings.
Facts
At approximately 11:00 pm. on January 28, 1996, Ketchikan Police…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Wasserman v. BartholomewAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Jacob S.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Midgett v. Cook Inlet Pre-Trial FacilityAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Marshall v. WimesNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.