Forgan v. Bainbridge
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
Appellants herein, plaintiffs in the lower court, brought an action in replevin against appellee, defendant below, to recover the possession of a certain Cadillac automobile or the value thereof. At the time of the trial it was stipulated that the automobile was in the possession of defendant, and plaintiffs announced that they waived a return of the car and sought a recovery of its value. The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts to the court, and judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $760, with interest. From this judgment they have appealed.
The following is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ruby v. United Sugar Companies, S. A.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Hart v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Forgan v. SmedalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Schram v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Davis v. Standard Accident InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.