Legal Opinion

Hilton v. Guyot

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 3, 1895No. Nos. 130 and 34PublishedCited by 1,145 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. . The first of these two eases was an action at law, brought December 18, 1885, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, by Gustave Bertin Guyot, as official liquidator of the firm of Charles Fortin & Co., and by the surviving members of that firm, all aliens…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. . The first of these two eases was an action at law, brought December 18, 1885, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, by Gustave Bertin Guyot, as official liquidator of the firm of Charles Fortin & Co., and by the surviving members of that firm, all aliens and citizens of the Republic of France, against Henry Hilton and William Libbey, citizens.of the United States and of the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

These two cases, the one at law and the other in equity, of Hilton v. Guyot, and the case of Ritchie v. McMullen which has been under advisement at the same time, present important questions relating to the force and effect of foreign judgments, not hitherto adjudicated by this court, which have been argued with great learning and ability, and which require for their satisfactory determination a full consideration of the authorities. To avoid confusion in indicating the parties, it will be convenient first to take the case at law of Hilton v. Guyot.

International law, in its widest and most…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. Elmendorf v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  4. Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. McElmoyle Ex Rel. Bailey v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,145 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Medellin v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

1,140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API