Forgan v. Smedal
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
This action was tried before the court, without a jury, upon a stipulated state of facts which disclosed substantially the following situation: Burnstine Motor Sales Company of Chicago, Illinois, on the 22d day of July, 1929, sold to one Eleanor Schlegel of Chicago, Illinois, a Chrysler automobile. At the time of such sale the seller and buyer entered into a conditional sales contract wherein the buyer agreed to pay the seller a balance of $758.06 in sixteen equal monthly instalments beginning the 22d day of August, 1929. This contract was thereafter duly assigned by the seller to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goetschius v. BrightmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Thayer Mercantile Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
- Forgan v. BainbridgeArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- Morey & Co. v. SchaadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- C. I. T. Corp. v. GuySupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
- People's Savings & Trust Co. v. Sheboygan Machine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Melentowich v. KlinkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Confidential Loan & Mortgage Co. v. HardgroveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.