Legal Opinion
Schram v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1938No. 8530PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
This is a companion case to Schram v. Poole, 9 Cir., 97 P.2d 665, June 16, 1938. A motion to dismiss a bill, filed by appellant as receiver of the First National Bank-Detroit, a national banking association, to recover liability of shareholders, having been sustained, the receiver appeals.
The history of the bank and its insolvency is set forth in Schram v. Poole, 9 Cir., supra, and need not be repeated here. The bill alleges that the stock of the above-named bank was held by Detroit Bankers’ Company, a Michigan corporation, hereinafter called the holding company; and that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ruhlin v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The Binghamton BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Orme v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sampson v. ChannellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Mardan Corp. v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd.District Court, D. Arizona · 1984
- Giustina v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
- Schram v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- United States Nat. Bank of Portland v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.