Legal Opinion

Hart v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1933No. 3698PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSPETH, Justice.

The facts material to the issues now before the court were, as found by the.trial court, briefly as follows:

In January, 1930, the defendant, W. B. Thompson, who was then residing in Hartley, Tex., executed and delivered to the B. M. Golloday Implement Company, intervener’s assignor, a chattel mortgage upon a Hart-Parr tractor and a conditional sale contract upon an Oliver ten-foot one-way plow. The former was given as security for the payment of certain promissory notes, and the latter to secure the balance of the purchase price of the plow. The transactions took place in…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Berizzi Brothers Co. v. SS PesaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Direction Der Disconto-Gesellschaft v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Johnston v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Mercantile Acceptance Co. v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Maryland v. CoardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  2. Bank of Atlanta v. FretzTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. NussSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  4. Ideal v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. LPNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Vincent v. General Motors Acceptance CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API