Legal Opinion
Kracht v. Perrin, Gartland & Doyle
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 23, 1990No. D009881PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FROEHLICH, J.
Plaintiff Brenda Kracht, as administratrix of the estate of William Thomas Wacha, appeals from an order of dismissal entered after the demurrer to Kracht’s complaint by defendants Perrin, Gartland & Doyle et al. (hereafter Attorneys) was sustained without leave to amend. Kracht argues the causes of action for legal malpractice alleged in her complaint are properly assertable by her as assignee, notwithstanding contrary California case law for the following reasons: (1) the claims are governed by Oregon law, which allegedly allows assignment of such claims; and (2) even if…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Christison v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. J.R. Marketing, L.L.C.California Supreme Court · 2015
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. McDonald, Hecht & SolbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Gurski v. Rosenblum and Filan, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Ellwanger v. Budsberg (In Re Ellwanger)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1992
- Quintilliani v. MannerinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.