Legal Opinion

State v. Henderson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 2005No. CR-04-0442-PRPublishedCited by 557 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MeGREGOR, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review to consider whether a reviewing court should consider a claim based upon Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), under a harmless error or a fundamental error standard when the defendant failed to raise the issue at trial. We hold that such claims should be reviewed for fundamental error.

I

¶ 2 Robert Allen Henderson lived with his 73-year-old mother, Marian Pyle, at her house. During an argument, Henderson assaulted Pyle. The assault continued until Pyle forced Henderson from her bedroom. The next…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by557 opinions

  1. State v. NewellArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew PayneArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. GlasselArizona Supreme Court · 2005

552 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API