State v. Garcia-Quintana
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Judge.
¶ 1 Gilberto Gareia-Quintana (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction and sentence for sale or transportation of marijuana, a class two felony. Defendant argues the court improperly admitted drug courier profile evidence. Because we conclude the evidence was properly admitted as modus operandi evidence, we affirm as modified, vacating the order Defendant pay for the cost of DNA testing.
Facts and Procedural History 1
¶ 2 Shortly before midnight, Border Patrol agents using infrared equipment spotted 11 men walking in the desert near Gila Bend, Arizona. A short time later,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Mariano MurilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Jaime Leon Gomez-NorenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- State v. MoranArizona Supreme Court · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. EscalanteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State v. UrreaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- State v. TeranCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022