State v. Coulter
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THUMMA, Judge.
¶ 1 Eric James Coulter appeals from his aggravated prison sentence for manslaughter, challenging the application of the statutory aggravating circumstance of “emotional or financial harm to the victim’s immediate family” and the requirement he pay for his own DNA testing. Although this court vacates the requirement that he pay for his own DNA testing, in all other respects Coulter’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 A jury convicted Coulter of manslaughter, a Class 2 felony and a dangerous and domestic violence offense, after he killed…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Franklin v. ClemettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- In Re: Ms2009-000010Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State v. FranciscoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- State v. FranciscoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- State v. GodoyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.