Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 4, 2014No. 1 CA-CR 12-0627PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSEN, Judge.

¶ 1 Odece Dempsean Hill was convicted of sexually assaulting a teenage girl, based in part on the testimony of a forensic nurse who related what the victim had told her in the emergency room three hours after the attack. The victim died before Hill was brought to trial, and he argued the nurse’s testimony violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution. Guided by recent United States Supreme Court cases, we conclude the superior court did not err by admitting the testimony because the victim’s statement was not testimonial.

FACTS AND…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Duhs v. CapraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. People v. Munoz-SalgadoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  3. People v. PalomeraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022
  4. State v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. NajeraUtah Supreme Court · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API