State v. Randles
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Judge.
¶ 1 Defendant Marco Keon Randles appeals his conviction and sentence for first degree premeditated murder. Randles raises two issues on appeal. First, Randles contends that Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) section 13-751, which permits a juvenile to be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of release on parole prior to serving 25 years, is unconstitutional. Second, Randles claims the trial court abused its discretion by precluding his expert from testifying about the alleged effects of alcohol consumed by the victim. For the reasons set forth below, we…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. SalazarArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Ronnie Roy VeraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State of Arizona v. Earl Jefferson CausbieCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- State v. DuarteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- State v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State v. BautistaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.