Legal Opinion
McCall v. Fickes
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1976No. 2611PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
The McCalls have appealed a superior court judgment granting “restitution” of certain rental premises to Fickes. Substantively, the instant appeal raises questions concerning the relationship between the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, AS 34.03.010 et seq., and Alaska’s Forcible Entry and Detainer Law, AS 09.45.060, et seq.
The Fickes are owners of a mobile home park located near Fairbanks. In November of 1974 the J. McCall Company, a service company for pipeline contractors, purchased a trailer from Fairbanks Mobile Homes, for use as a residence for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Peters v. Juneau-Douglas Girl Scout CouncilAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Thrift Shop, Inc. v. Alaska Mutual Savings BankAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
- Ayers v. Day and Night Fuel Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Schaible v. Fairbanks Medical & Surgical Clinic, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sullivan v. SubramanianAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Vinson v. HamiltonAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Osness v. Dimond Estates, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Ostlund v. HendricksOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Helfrich v. Valdez Motel Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.