Legal Opinion

Helfrich v. Valdez Motel Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 2009No. S-12776PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The main issue in this appeal is whether a landlord violates the anti-retaliation statute, AS 34.03.310(a)(2), of the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (URLTA) by evicting a tenant who demands personal injury compensation following an on-premises slip and fall. The superior court held that it does not, and therefore granted a directed verdict to the landlord on the tenant's URL-TA retaliation claim. Because a claim for personal injury damages resulting from an on-premises fall is not for "rights and remedies granted" under URLTA,1 we affirm.

II.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jennings v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Prentzel v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. City of Kodiak v. SamaniegoAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Shearer v. MundtAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Schaefer v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richard R. Watkinson v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Tammie Guilford v. Weidner Investment Services, Inc., Weidner Investment Services, Inc. v. Tammie GuilfordAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Tuyen Dinh v. Matthew Raines and Melissa ClaytonAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Helfrich v. Valdez Motel Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. McManus v. The Aleutian Region School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API