Helfrich v. Valdez Motel Corp.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The main issue in this appeal is whether a landlord violates the anti-retaliation statute, AS 34.03.310(a)(2), of the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (URLTA) by evicting a tenant who demands personal injury compensation following an on-premises slip and fall. The superior court held that it does not, and therefore granted a directed verdict to the landlord on the tenant's URL-TA retaliation claim. Because a claim for personal injury damages resulting from an on-premises fall is not for "rights and remedies granted" under URLTA,1 we affirm.
II.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jennings v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Prentzel v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Kodiak v. SamaniegoAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Shearer v. MundtAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Schaefer v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richard R. Watkinson v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
- Tammie Guilford v. Weidner Investment Services, Inc., Weidner Investment Services, Inc. v. Tammie GuilfordAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
- Tuyen Dinh v. Matthew Raines and Melissa ClaytonAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
- Helfrich v. Valdez Motel Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
- McManus v. The Aleutian Region School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2021