Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ostlund v. Hendricks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1980No. TC 14763-D, CA 14768, SC 26776PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

The legal issue presented is whether the notice of termination required by ORS 91.885 for termination of a rental agreement for a mobile home space must contain a "designated date” for termination. The following are the facts which present this issue.

The plaintiff is manager and owner of a mobile home park. On December 14, 1974, defendant signed an agreement for a month to month rental of a space for a mobile home. Plaintiff’s attorney wrote defendant a letter dated December 12,1978, informing her that she was in violation of her tenancy agreement in several particulars.1 The letter concluded:

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCall v. FickesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Teresi v. Gina Belmonte Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Ostlund v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hickey v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Coleman v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Greenway v. ParlantiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Johnson Mobile Park, Inc. v. SchoffstallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Johnson Mobile Park, Inc. v. SchoffstallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API