Legal Opinion

Vinson v. Hamilton

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1993No. S-4857PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Jack Vinson appeals a decision of the superior court affirming the district court’s judgment against him in a proceeding for forcible entry and detainer. Vinson’s landlord, Robert J. Hamilton, instituted the action after terminating Vinson’s month-to-month tenancy. Vinson challenges the denial of both his motion .for a continuance and his request for a jury trial. We reverse the denial of the continuance, and affirm the denial of a jury trial.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In December 1989 Vinson rented a house from Hamilton under an oral month-to-month…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Pernell v. Southall RealtySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  5. State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Shields v. Cape Fox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Greene v. TinkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Henrichs v. Chugach Alaska Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. NP Dodge Mgmt. Co. v. HolcombNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Oakly Enterprises, LLC v. NPI, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API