Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Snap-Tite, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1972No. Civ. 38423PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FILES, P. J.
This case of first impression involves the application of rule 203.5(f), California Rules of Court, which authorizes the superior court to impose conditions upon the denial of a motion to dismiss an action under Code of Civil Procedure section 583, subdivision (a).
The trial court made an order on December 7, 1970, granting a motion to dismiss this action for want of prosecution “unless on or before December 15, 1970 plaintiff pays to defendant the sum of $10,000.00 as reimbursement of attorney fees incurred for prior preparation, said sum not to be recoverable as costs. If…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Caruso v. Snap-Tite, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Gleneagle Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- JADE K. v. ViguriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Tannatt v. JoblinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Andre v. General Dynamics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Hearst v. FerranteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.