Legal Opinion
Caruso v. Snap-Tite, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1969No. Civ. 32966PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.
Plaintiff Paul Caruso appeals from an order granting the motion of defendants. Snap-Tite, Inc. and Jackson Appliance, Inc. to exclude evidence, on his alleged cause of action for legal services rendered, for failure to supply defendants with a sufficient bill of particulars (as provided under Code Civ. Proc., § 454).
Caruso, and two other plaintiffs (not involved in this appeal), filed a complaint in this action against Snap-Tite, Inc., Jackson Appliance, Inc. and against another corporation plus two named individuals and twenty doe defendants. The complaint is in two counts. The first count…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gombos v. AsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- City of Los Angeles v. SchweitzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Turner v. Los Angeles Realty Board, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Horton v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Burton v. Santa Barbara Nat'l BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jennings v. MarralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Vedder v. County of ImperialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. BelknapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Steen v. Fremont Cemetery Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Hansen v. Snap-Tite, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.