Legal Opinion

JADE K. v. Viguri

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 1989No. D007659PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KREMER, P. J.

Defendant Juan Viguri appeals a default judgment favoring plaintiffs Jade K. and his mother Elizabeth Billick (together K.). Viguri also appeals a prejudgment order denying his motion to vacate default. Viguri further appeals a postjudgment order denying his motion to reconsider the order denying his motion to vacate default. We find Viguri’s appeal from the default judgment and the order denying his motion to vacate default must be dismissed as untimely. To the extent the order denying reconsideration may be independently appealable, we affirm such order.

Intervener Truck…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Blue Mountain Development Co. v. CarvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. I. J. Weinrot & Son, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Garcia v. HejmadiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Passavanti v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Howard v. Thrifty Drug & Discount StoresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Peltier v. McCloud River RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API