Legal Opinion

Tannatt v. Joblin

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1982No. Civ. 63156PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DALSIMER, J.

Introduction

Appellant Sylvia J. Tannatt (plaintiff) appeals from an order of dismissal of her complaint as to respondents Joseph Joblin, Esq. (Joblin), Associated Bond and Insurance Agency (Associated), and National Automobile and Casualty Insurance Company (National), pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 583, subdivision (a).1

*1065Facts

On April 12, 1977, plaintiff filed her “Complaint for Money,” naming 10 specific defendants and 10 fictitiously designated defendants.

The thrust of the complaint is that the first named defendant, Harry Oringer (Oringer), with the direct…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Gleneagle Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Hansen v. Snap-Tite, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. Statewide Home Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Luti v. Graco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Campanella v. TakaokaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Longshore v. PineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Dubois v. Corroon & Black Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API