Legal Opinion

Hearst v. Ferrante

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1987No. B016067PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.—

Some attorneys are so addicted to litigation that they will do anything to prolong it. Regrettably, that is why the California Reports contain an ever growing number of cases devoted to sanctions. ■

Here is .yet another contribution to the sanctions proliferation. Where sanctions are awarded pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5, 1 the court must state in writing its reasons for the order. (Fegles v. Kraft (1985) 168 Cal.App.3d 812, 816-817 [214 Cal.Rptr. 380].) Here we hold that where sanctions are awarded against a party as a condition of relieving him from a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Fegles v. KraftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Williams v. MyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Hansen v. Snap-Tite, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. JADE K. v. ViguriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API