Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Abbott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 1990No. WCB 87-13095, 87-13096, 87-13097; CA A50887PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Petitioners seek review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that set aside SAIF’s backup denials of responsibility for claimant’s back injury and carpal tunnel syndrome.

Claimant was an employee of Pinkertons Detective Agency, which was hired by Olympic Forest Products to investigate the unusual number of worker’s compensation claims that were being filed at one of its sawmills, as well as suspected drug use by employees at that mill. Pinkertons placed an undercover detective, claimant, in the mill to do the investigation. He worked as an entry level mill worker and received a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Johnson v. Spectra PhysicsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Colvin v. Industrial IndemnityOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ebbtide Enterprises v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. SAIF Corp. v. TullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Greenbriar Ag Management v. LemusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. SAIF Corp. v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API