Legal Opinion

Colvin v. Industrial Indemnity

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1986No. WCB 81-03061; CA A31519; SC 32190PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This is a workers’ compensation case in which claimant seeks benefits for injuries that occurred at a picnic sponsored by the law firm for which she worked. Both the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) and the Court of Appeals denied her benefits on the ground that her notice of claim was untimely. She seeks both reversal of the Court of Appeals interpretation of the knowledge requirement stated in ORS 656.265(4) (a) 1 and remand to the Court of Appeals to determine whether respondent was prejudiced by her untimely notice. We agree that the Court of Appeals misinterpreted ORS 656.265(4)(a)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frasure v. Agripac, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Vandre v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Colvin v. Industrial IndemnityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Frasure v. Agripac, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Vsetecka v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Godfrey v. Fred Meyer StoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Argonaut Insurance v. MockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. SAIF Corp. v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Tri-Met, Inc. v. OdighizuwaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API