Legal Opinion

Department of Consumer & Business Services v. Muliro

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2016No. WCB 103496, 1102720; CA A152594; SC S062922PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Under the Workers’ Compensation Act, an injured worker with more than one employer may be entitled to receive supplemental temporary disability benefits from the Workers’ Benefit Fund, in addition to the disability benefits the worker receives from the employer’s insurer. The injured worker cannot qualify “unless the insurer **⅜ receives,” within 30 days of receipt of an initial claim, “notice that the worker was employed in more than one job” at the time of injury. QRS 656.210(2)(b)(A). The question in this case is whether an injured worker must provide actual notice of the worker’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. McNallyOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. HubbellOregon Supreme Court · 2023
  3. SAIF v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Daniel N. Gordon, PC v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. S.-Q. K. (In re S.-Q. K.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API