Legal Opinion

Department of Consumer & Business Services v. Muliro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 10, 2014No. 1103496, 1102720; A152594PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.

The Workers’ Compensation Division of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS) seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (the board) affirming an administrative law judge’s (ALJ) order directing payment of supplemental disability to claimant. Specifically, DCBS challenges the board’s conclusion that, although claimant failed to timely notify her employer’s insurer that she had multiple employers, as required by ORS 656.210(2)(b)(A), the insurer had “imputed notice” of claimant’s secondary employment, because claimant’s employer was aware that she had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Anfilofieff v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Colvin v. Industrial IndemnityOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Ebbtide Enterprises v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Nix v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. CueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. DCBS v. MuliroOregon Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API