Legal Opinion

Rush v. French

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1874PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Appeal from the third judicial district, county of Yavapai. The opinion states the ease.

1Opinion of the Court

By Court,

Dunne, C. J.:

This was an appeal from the third district court, Yavapai county, the judge of the second district presiding. It was an action of ejectment to recover possession of a certain mining claim known as the first north extension of the Tiger lode, or vein, in Tiger mining district, Yavapai county, Arizona territory. Tried at the June term, 1874. Judgment below for plaintiff. New trial refused. Defendants appeal from the judgment and order refusing new trial. Appeal heard January term, 1875.

*108On the tenth of January, 1871, D. 0. Moreland located for himself and others one…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. StimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. Hinde's Lessee v. LongworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  3. Camden v. DoremusSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Coryell v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Love v. Simm's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Nottingham Village, Inc. v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. State v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Lipscomb v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1897

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API