Larson v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $280 for breach of an oral contract. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Montgomery, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $250. Erom an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.
Appeal by tbe defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial, after verdict for the plaintiff. The latter’s theories of his right to a recovery were, that the parties agreed to exchange labor in the construction of dwellings, the plaintiff undertaking to furnish the labor in the construction of a foundation on the defendant’s property, the defendant to make the excavation and to furnish the material, and in exchange therefor the defendant agreeing to lath and plaster the plaintiff’s house, including the furnishing of material, and also to pay to the plaintiff $75, and that each…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Graves v. BonnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Paine v. CraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Ormond v. SageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Collins v. DowlanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
3Cited by9 opinions
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Schall v. Northland Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- State v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Finley v. PewWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
- Pleason Realty & Investment Co. v. KleinmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.